How to Build Stairs by S. Joshua Brincko

Stairs can be a great, sculptural focal point for a home, deck, or business, and they certainly provide a useful function too: to get you up and down safely. Stairs are complicated. They are tricky to design, tough to build, and there’s a whole myriad of codes that must be complied with. As an experienced architect and craftsman, I have learned a few tricks over the years for building stairs. There’s some seasoned veterans out there that can do it well too, but I have created some unique tricks that have helped many builders.

On most projects, I’ll get a call from the builder about how to frame the stair. As an architect, framing is not in my purview, but I get it… being out there on a hot, cold, windy, or rainy jobsite perched high up on a ladder is not the best place to figure out how to fit one of the trickiest things you can build into a project. With a couple measurements, I can usually help the builder figure this out rather quickly. All I really need is the exact change in vertical height from one floor to the other and the exact horizontal length from one landing to the next. Depending on the design, there’s a few other bits of info I may need, but I can advise on those when applicable.

Once I have those critical measurements, I can draw the stair stringer (or stair carriage) in autocad. This enables me to create an exact diagram of all the parts and pieces needed for a stair. After I’ve drawn it, I can send the builder all the measurements needed to confirm it works. I can also send full sized printed templates to the job site, so builders can simply “trace” them with a saw. This takes all the guesswork out of it. In some applications, I could even cut the stair stringer on a CNC milling machine to send the finished product to the job site ready to install. Imagine the entire day you spend planning and measuring (and re-measuring) for a stair being unnecessary because a perfectly cut stringer magically shows up on the job site for you.

Feel free to reach out if you need help with a stair you are planning. This will save you time and money.

Also for reference, there’s a lot of codes that relate to stairs, and some of the more common ones for residential applications are (check your codes in your area to verify and consult with a professional to confirm):

  • treads must be a minimum of 10”

  • risers have a maximum of 7.75”

  • treads must be a minimum of 36” wide

  • handrails may project up to 4.5” over the treads on each side

  • handrails must be 34”-38” high

  • guardrails must be 36” high with a maximum spacing of 4” (6” ok at the triangular area of tread/riser) and must withstand 200 pounds of force in all directions

  • landings must be the same width as the stair and at least 36” long

  • there are also additional codes to comply with

Hand Drawing is Still a Thing! by Josh Brincko

190928_Trace_Top10_07_JoshBrincko

Architects draw most things on a computer with AutoCAD. It makes sense for most stages of the process. I have discovered a hack for designing and drawing construction details though. Construction details are “zoomed-in” drawings that focus on the connection between different materials. They help to communicate to the builder the real goal with how things get put together. These are typically drafted in black and white in AutoCAD, but we have found that they are tough to understand, time consuming, and builders rarely actually reference them in a set of plans.

With the use of my iPad and it’s Apple Pencil, I have discovered a magical app (by recommendation of Andres Villaveces at Metrica) that allows me to draw “by hand” but still digitally. The Apple Pencil actually feels and operates like a real pencil, but it works even better… and you can undo mistakes, you don’t get lead all over your arm/shirt, and I can draw while sitting on the couch or virtually anywhere (a drafting table is no longer needed).

Builders love the drawings because they actually understand them, and it saves me (and my clients) time in drawing them. The app I use, called Morpholio Trace, actually featured my work in its recent top 10 list: https://medium.com/@morpholio/top-10-trace-sketches-of-the-month-290fb2c8e1b3. It has been such a great technological advancement in my industry that has increased my productivity. I can also use it to review my coworker’s drawings for quality control. The days of printing, redlining, scanning, and emailing are over for the simple task of checking drawings. I can now just “redline” (review) progress work directly from my ipad and easily email it.

If you’d like to learn more about our design process, visit www.josharch.com/process, and if you’d like to get us started on your project with a feasibility report, please visit www.josharch.com/help

Radiant Floor Heating by S. Joshua Brincko

Radiant floor heating…It’s awesome! Does it make sense in your situation?

In the USA, the most common type of heating is a furnace, called “forced air,” that blows air around your house in metal duct work. When the house gets cold, the furnace kicks on, and you feel warm air blowing out of the vents. Then the air in the room cools down again, and the process continues. This is a sort of instant gratification. It is very American, actually.

Let me illustrate this with an analogy. Your body is 98.6 degrees, right? When you exhale, your breath is about 98 degrees or something less. If our hands are cold, we can blow air out of our mouth to warm up our hands. Do your hands stay warm after one breath of air, or do you need to keep blowing air? Imagine trying to warm up a cup of coffee with your breath. It could probably be done, but it would take a constant flow of heat from your breath to accomplish this. You will probably pass out before the coffee heats up. THE SAME THING HAPPENS WITH A FURNACE. When hot air blows out of your vents, it warms up the air, but it does not warm up the floors, the walls, the tables, the chairs, and all the other solid items in your house. Do you remember learning about conduction in science class? More heat can be stored in a solid or liquid than a gas. Air is a gas, and furnaces try to heat you (a solid) and your house (a solid) by storing heat in air that blows on you. It does not have a lasting effect, and therefor it is not efficient. (It also blows a lot of dust, mites, and other allergens around that are not good for your respiratory health).

Radiant heating works by transferring the heat from a liquid to solids. In other words, water in pipes is heated up, and those water pipes touch your floors and transfer the heat to your floors. The heat in your solid floors conducts to the other solid items in your home, and the heat is more efficiently stored. It also feels more cozy because it is a long-lasting, continuous heat that warms you to the core instead of just blowing air over your skin.

Staple-up in-floor heating pipes with metal fins to disperse heat

Staple-up in-floor heating pipes with metal fins to disperse heat

Notice all the STUFF in the ceiling of an existing home. This must all be removed and replaced before installing in-floor radiant heating pipes.

Notice all the STUFF in the ceiling of an existing home. This must all be removed and replaced before installing in-floor radiant heating pipes.

So how do you get radiant floors in your home? Water pipes (usually plastic called PEX) need to be attached to your floors. This is easiest to do when your house is under construction. If you are pouring concrete floors, the PEX is laid our before the concrete is poured, and they get permanently cast into the concrete. If your floors are framed with wood, the PEX is usually stapled up to the underside of the floors. This is pretty easy to do in new construction since there’s not too much stuff in the way (like lights, wires, insulation, and plumbing). In a remodeling situation, it is a bit more challenging since you first need to remove the ceiling and everything inside of it before you can staple up the PEX. You even need to grind away any nails or staples that may be poking through the floor, so they don’t accidentally puncture the PEX water pipes. This demolition work can get very expensive (likely more costly than the price of the radiant heating system itself). This gets even more challenging in a crawlspace where workers would need to work on their backs to staple PEX to the underside of a floor. Nothing is impossible, but having a clean slate helps to keep the cost feasible. New construction and new additions are pretty easy to integrate radiant floor heating.

Project foreman inspecting in-floor heating in existing slab. (Notice the wood shelves in the background… a worker set those there, and they punctured the water pipes. Extreme caution is necessary).

Project foreman inspecting in-floor heating in existing slab. (Notice the wood shelves in the background… a worker set those there, and they punctured the water pipes. Extreme caution is necessary).

Water pipes laid in concrete slab before it is poured. Notice the insulation board below the pipes.

Water pipes laid in concrete slab before it is poured. Notice the insulation board below the pipes.

If you want to install the PEX into an existing concrete slab, you would either need to break up the slab and pour a new one, or you could cut out grooves to put the pipes into. Then you would cover those grooves with another layer of concrete and possibly another floor material. We have used radiant floor heating with success in all different floor materials - including hardwoods. Hardwoods do tend to shrink and swell with changes in temperature, so “engineered hardwoods” are a better choice when using radiant floor heating although we have never actually seen a problem with real hardwoods (only heard of them…knock on wood…literally).

There is a possibility of using electric radiant floor heating. This is not very efficient though. The cost of electricity to create the heat is not justifiable at this time. Most radiant heating is powered with natural gas or propane which is a lot cheaper than the electric counterpart. Electric radiant floor heating can be a viable option for small areas like bathrooms though. Small wires are laid on the floor (like a heated blanket), and they are covered with mortar and tile. A thermostat on the bathroom wall controls the system, and a thermostat with a timer can help keep the operation cost reasonable.

Manifold panel that sends heated water from a boiler to various parts of a home through PEX water pipes

Manifold panel that sends heated water from a boiler to various parts of a home through PEX water pipes

Gas powered radiant floor systems work with a boiler. A boiler is a box about the size of a shoe box for cowboy boots, and it has a series of water pipes that pass over a flame. The flame heats the pipes, and the water in the pipes gets hot. It is pretty simple. Once the water pipes leave the boiler, they separate out (in the manifold) into different pipes for each area of your home. Each of those areas can have their own thermostat, so you could individually control the heat. These pipes travel back to the boiler to keep reheating the water in the pipes. There is a complicated panel of pipes called a manifold that needs to be located near the boiler. This is where the water pipes separate out to travel to the different areas - and later return from those areas before being sent back into the boiler for reheating. This manifold is the “brain” of the system which has sensors that link back to the thermostats in each room and also link back to the boiler to tell it when to heat up some more water.

Besides their small size and efficiency, another good part about boilers is that they can also be a substitute for your hot water tank for your shower, tub, and sinks. This saves even more space. The boiler and manifold just need to be located in an area where you can run a vent pipe to the outside (since burning flames indoors requires oxygen to burn and also requires exhausting of the gasses to the outdoors).

If you are considering adding in-floor heating in an addition, you must also consider what you will do with your existing heating system. It is my opinion that two separate systems is too complicated. Also, once you have the boiler and manifold panel, it is a shame to not use that infrastructure to its maximum potential to heat the whole house - instead of just the new part of the house. You could remove the existing heating system and expand the in-floor heating to the existing house, or you could consider not doing radiant and just extend your current system to the new addition. Sometimes your existing heating system is not big enough to heat up additional square footage though. Your builder and architect can help you evaluate that. Sometimes we advise people to just make their current system work 150% to heat the addition and existing spaces until it breaks. Then they replace the existing system when/if that happens.

In summary, it is easy to incorporate in-floor heating in new construction and additions, but retrofitting it into an existing condition must be a labor of love since paying someone to do it for you would be a major expense.

If you’d like to learn more about our design process, visit www.josharch.com/process, and if you’d like to get us started on your project with a feasibility report, please visit www.josharch.com/help

A Message to Garcia (and Josh’s Commentary On It) by S. Joshua Brincko

I’ve been told the US Navy makes its sailors read this witty story written by Elbert Hubbard in 1899 to teach them how to think big and focus on getting the job done. I’ve always liked the underlying message in most of the essay, which is basically: quit making excuses, and just flipping start doing the thing that you’re supposed to be doing. Since the writing is outdated, I pasted the original with my commentary in italics, so you can see what it means (to me) in today’s context:

A Message to Garcia, by Elbert Hubbard (1899)

In all this Cuban business there is one man stands out on the horizon of my memory like Mars at perihelion.

He is basically saying he can only think of one guy that acts appropriately since it is such a rarity for people to actually “do as they are told.”

When war broke out between Spain and the United States, it was very necessary to communicate quickly with the leader of the Insurgents. Garcia was somewhere in the mountain fastnesses of Cuba - no one knew where. No mail or telegraph could reach him. The President must secure his cooperation, and quickly.

There’s a guy named Garcia hiding in Cuba somewhere that the President of the USA must deliver an urgent letter to, and nobody knows exactly where Garcia is.

What to do!

Someone said to the President, “There’s a fellow by the name of Rowan will find Garcia for you, if anybody can.”

Rowan is the guy who can simply deliver a letter without F-ing it up. Rowan is who we all should strive to be since he can simply “do what he is told.”

Rowan was sent for and given a letter to be delivered to Garcia. How “the fellow by name of Rowan” took the letter, sealed it up in an oil-skin pouch, strapped it over his heart, in four days landed by night off the coast of Cuba from an open boat, disappeared into the jungle, and in three weeks came out on the other side of the island, having traversed a hostile country on foot, and having delivered his letter to Garcia, are things I have no special desire now to tell in detail. The point I wish to make is this: McKinley gave Rowan a letter to be delivered to Garcia; Rowan took the letter and did not ask, “Where is he at?”

Rowan just simply did it. He didn’t ask anyone how to do it. He didn’t ask where to take it. He never asked why. He simply figured it out himself and got the job done. He didn’t make anyone wish they had just done it themselves. He made the delivery of a letter into his own problem and nobody else’s. When the President asked him to do it, he just did it. The President did not need to wonder if it would get done or if it would be done successfully. The President knew that if he told Rowan to do it, then the task was as good as being done, and the President could assume as much. No further followup from the President is required. The President has 100% faith in Rowan.

By the Eternal! There is a man whose form should be cast in deathless bronze and the statue placed in every college in the land. It is not book-learning young men need, nor instruction about this or that, but a stiffening of the vertebrae which will cause them to be loyal to a trust, to act promptly, concentrate their energies; do the thing - “carry a message to Garcia!”

Rowan is the perfect teammate, and a statue of Rowan should be erected to remind the rest of us to be just like Rowan.

General Garcia is dead now, but there are other Garcias. No man, who has endeavored to carry out an enterprise where many hands were needed, but has been well-nigh appalled at times by the imbecility of the average man - the inability or unwillingness to concentrate on a thing and do it.

Although this letter is already delivered, there will always be future tasks that still need to be accomplished, and when those tasks are assigned, the person completing the task should remember the diligence of Rowan and not defer to become the average sort of person who is too lazy to be resourceful and simply figure out on their own how to do the task assigned to them.

Slipshod assistance, foolish inattention, dowdy indifference, and half-hearted work seem the rule; and no man succeeds, unless by hook or crook, or threat, he forces or bribes other men to assist him; or mayhap, God in His goodness performs a miracle, and sends him an Angel of Light for an assistant.

Most people are not like Rowan. They pawn their tasks back to the person who ask them to do it, and the assigner regrets ever assigning it to the assignee. It would have been much easier for the assigner to just do the task themselves instead of thinking someone else could do it instead. We have all heard the phrase, “if you want it done right, do it yourself.” There’s some truth to this unfortunately. We have grown too accustomed to bad service, and we have lost faith in others since there’s no accountability. The thing we need to realize is this: WE LEARN BY STRETCHING OURSELVES TO DO NEW THINGS. We need to push our boundaries to become a better person.

You, reader, put this matter to a test: You are sitting now in your office—six clerks are within your call. Summon any one and make this request: “Please look in the encyclopedia and make a brief memorandum for me concerning the life of Corregio.”

Try testing the theory. Go ask someone this simple question: “I need to know if Florida or Ohio is further west.” Chances are nobody will just find the answer without first asking: why do you need to know, or I think it’s Ohio (without actually looking up the facts).

Will the clerk quietly say, “Yes, sir,” and go do the task?

Haha. Good luck finding someone so cooperative in this era. The next few statements are still relevant today (120 years after the writing), except that we don’t use encyclopedias anymore…enjoy:

On your life, he will not. He will look at you out of a fishy eye, and ask one or more of the following questions:

Who was he?

Which encyclopedia?

Where is the encyclopedia?

Was I hired for that?

Don’t you mean Bismarck?

What’s the matter with Charlie doing it?

Is he dead?

Is there any hurry?

Shan’t I bring you the book and let you look it up yourself? What do you want to know for?

And I will lay you ten to one that after you have answered the questions, and explained how to find the information, and why you want it, the clerk will go off and get one of the other clerks to help him find Garcia - and then come back and tell you there is no such man. Of course I may lose my bet, but according to the Law of Average, I will not.

Now if you are wise you will not bother to explain to your “assistant” that Corregio is indexed under the C’s, not in the K’s, but you will smile sweetly and say, “Never mind,” and go look it up yourself. And this incapacity for independent action, this moral stupidity, this infirmity of the will, this unwillingness to cheerfully catch hold and lift, are the things that put pure socialism so far into the future. If men will not act for themselves, what will they do when the benefit of their effort is for all?

Acting for yourself is good, but acting for the greater good is truly noble.

A first mate with knotted club seems necessary; and the dread of getting “the bounce” Saturday night holds many a worker in his place.

Advertise for a stenographer, and nine times out of ten who apply can neither spell nor punctuate - and do not think it necessary to.

Can such a one write a letter to Garcia?

“You see that bookkeeper,” said the foreman to me in a large factory.

“Yes, what about him?”

“Well, he’s a fine accountant, but if I’d send him to town on an errand, he might accomplish the errand all right, and, on the other hand, might stop at four saloons on the way, and when he got to Main Street, would forget what he had been sent for.”

With Facebook…nothing really gets done. The rest of the essay is more satirical, and I will not comment further, but here it is for your reference. As you go on for the rest of your day (and life), remember to be Rowan and find your own Garcias :)

Can such a man be entrusted to carry a message to Garcia?

We have recently been hearing much maudlin sympathy expressed for the “down-trodden denizen of the sweat shop” and the “homeless wanderer searching for honest employment,” and with it all often go many hard words for the men in power.

Nothing is said about the employer who grows old before his time in a vain attempt to get frowsy ne’er-do-wells to do intelligent work; and his long patient striving with “help” that does nothing but loaf when his back is turned. In every store and factory there is a constant weeding-out process going on. The employer is constantly sending away “help” that have shown their incapacity to further the interests of the business, and others are being taken on. No matter how good times are, this sorting continues, only if times are hard and work is scarce, this sorting is done finer - but out and forever out, the incompetent and unworthy go. It is the survival of the fittest. self-interest prompts every employer to keep the best-those who can carry a message to Garcia.

I know one man of really brilliant parts who has not the ability to manage a business of his own, and yet who is absolutely worthless to anyone else, because he carries with him constantly the insane suspicion that his employer is oppressing, or intending to oppress, him. He can not give orders, and he will not receive them. Should a message be given him to take to Garcia, his answer would probably be, “Take it yourself.”

Tonight this man walks the streets looking for work, the wind whistling through his threadbare coat. No one who knows him dare employ him, for he is a regular firebrand of discontent. He is impervious to reason, and the only thing that can impress him is the toe of a thick-soled No. 9 boot.

Of course I know that one so morally deformed is no less to be pitied than a physical cripple; but in your pitying, let us drop a tear, too, for the men who are striving to carry on a great enterprise, whose working hours are not limited by the whistle, and whose hair is fast turning white through the struggle to hold the line in dowdy indifference, slipshod imbecility, and the heartless ingratitude which, but for their enterprise, would be both hungry and homeless.

Have I put the matter too strongly? Possibly I have; but when all the world has gone a-slumming I wish to speak a word of sympathy for the man who succeeds - the man who, against great odds, has directed the efforts of others, and, having succeeded, finds there’s nothing in it: nothing but bare board and clothes. I have carried a dinner-pail and worked for a day’s wages, and I have also been an employer of labor, and I know there is something to be said on both sides. There is no excellence, per se, in poverty; rags are no recommendation; and all employers are not rapacious and high-handed, any more than all poor men are virtuous.

My heart goes out to the man who does his work when the “boss” is away, as well as when he is home. And the man who, when given a letter for Garcia, quietly takes the missive, without asking any idiotic questions, and with no lurking intention of chucking it into the nearest sewer, or of doing aught else but deliver it, never gets “laid off,” nor has to go on strike for higher wages. Civilization is one long anxious search for just such individuals. Anything such a man asks will be granted; his kind is so rare that no employer can afford to let him go. He is wanted in every city, town, and village - in every office, shop, store and factory. The world cries out for such; he is needed, and needed badly—the man who can

Carry a message to Garcia.

If you’d like to learn more about our design process, visit www.josharch.com/process, and if you’d like to get us started on your project with a feasibility report, please visit www.josharch.com/help

Small Lots Equal Cool Houses by S. Joshua Brincko

The typical lot in many cities is a rectangle with 5’ side yard setbacks and 20’ or so front/rear yard setbacks. This is space on a property where you’re not allowed to build the house with the purpose to leave open space. This results in a buildable area that is exactly the same for every lot in a neighborhood, and this results in a lack of variety.

Occasionally you have that odd-ball lot in a city with a weird shape or size which is really common in West Seattle where I live and work. A quirky corner lot, or leftover space from previous subdivisions, a tiny or narrow parcel, or something on a steep slope that is tricky for construction creates a unique design opportunity. These differences in lot configurations require architects to think creatively to envision design solutions that conform to the tricky constraints of the unique lots. Similar to how sloped ceilings in attics can create charming interior spaces, small lots can result in unique and inspiring homes that positively challenge the norm of the boring, repetitious, cookie-cutter neighborhoods we see all to much. As an architect who is an expert in designing innovative homes, I excel and am passionate about the creative challenges that come with designing homes on small lots.

Here’s some cool homes we have seen by some talented architects that have been the result of unique and small lots that we commonly reference when we design unique homes:

By Prentis Hale

By Prentis Hale

By Unknown

By Unknown

By George Suyama

By George Suyama

By Unknown

By Unknown

By Unknown

By Unknown

By Unknown

By Unknown

Amsterdam canal

Amsterdam canal

If you’d like to learn more about our design process, visit www.josharch.com/process, and if you’d like to get us started on your project with a feasibility report, please visit www.josharch.com/help

Surveys: do you need one? by S. Joshua Brincko

As explained in the short video above, a survey is a drawing prepared by a licensed surveyor that documents the exact location of your property lines. To learn more, read the post below, and also watch the more thorough video at the end of the post.

Why are surveys important, and why do you need one?

Knowing where your property line is located is important if you are building a new structure or adding onto one. If you want to expand your kitchen into your back yard, you first need to know if you are ALLOWED to build that addition in the space that’s available in your back yard. A surveyor can determine exactly where your property lines are located, and your architect can use that to determine how far away your house must be from each property line. This is known as a setback. Different cities and different zoning classifications have different setbacks for buildings, decks, and garages from front, side, and rear property lines. There’s also required setbacks from things like steep slopes, wells, bald eagle nests, septic tanks, streams, etc. A surveyor can accurately document these things, so you can be sure your project gets built legally in an area that the city allows. You wouldn’t want an inspector to require you to tear down your home because it’s built too close to a property line.

Let’s expel a myth…please!

YOUR FENCE IS NOT YOUR PROPERTY LINE.

YOUR SIDEWALK OR YOUR CURB IS NOT YOUR PROPERTY LINE.

Or when the old guy that used to live there said, “the rock by the cedar tree is on the property corner,” THAT DOESN’T MEAN A DAMN THING.

The building department will not give a rip about where you think your fence is, or whatever the old guy in the neighborhood told you. A survey is the only legal document that can determine (and prove) where your property lines are, and most importantly, how far your house is located from those property lines. Without a survey, your architect cannot know exactly where to design your project, and the building department will not know if they can approve your drawings to issue a permit for construction.

Another reason a survey is often required would be to document lot coverage. Lot coverage is a percentage of your property that is allowed to be covered by buildings, decks, patios, or some combination thereof. A surveyor locates the exact locations of all these items on a property, so your architect can calculate how much surface area each item is. For example, in Seattle, you are allowed to cover up to 35% of your typical 5000 SF property with structures. Knowing the exact size of the existing house, garage, shed, trellis, deck, etc will enable your architect to know if you are already exceeding your maximum lot coverage or not. Without this information, you cannot be certain that there is any remaining area that is allowed to be covered with a bigger house.

Surveyors also document trees and topography (the slope of your land). This is important because there are some restrictions on removing certain trees, required setbacks from some trees, and the minimum amount of trees (and tree sizes) your property is required to have since trees do a pretty good job of sucking up rainwater to prevent overburdening the sewer systems from stormwater runoff. Knowing the slope of your land also helps your architect to design a building that appropriately fits into the hillside while not requiring too much soil to be excavated and removed (which is very costly). Additionally, some slopes are classified as “steep slopes” when they exceed a certain height or percentage of slope, and your architect needs to know where the exact top and bottom of those slopes are located. The required setbacks (buffers) from those slopes can be maintained with your new project. We also use surveyors to document the height limit of your house, and this is determined by knowing the topography of your land since the maximum height limit is determined by calculating the average height of the ground.

Lastly, a surveyor also documents easements. These are portions of your property that are generally used by someone other than the property owner. For example a neighbor might have a drain pipe going through your yard, and there might be an easement documented that does not allow you to build within that area. Again this is important information your architect needs, so he or she will be able to design a project for you.

In some instances a survey is not required. This takes a bit of discretion and risk, but if your property has no slope and the building will be nowhere near your property lines, nowhere near the maximum lot coverage, and not even close to the maximum height, then your architect and building department can work with certainty knowing that the requirements for these items will not be exceeded. So how much tolerance is there? In my experience, if you are required to build at least 5’ away from a property line, and you are proposing to build 7’ away, then that additional 2’ buffer will usually suffice. It’s sort of like speeding: 5 or 10 mph over the speed limit, and you’re likely fine - but you never know.

Most properties have never been surveyed, so nobody really knows where the property lines are located until a surveyor calculates and measures it. They do this by triangulating other known points that have been previously documented on other surveys which could be several blocks away. They work their way back to your property from those other landmarks using trigonometry and expensive GPS enabled equipment with lasers and other fancy technologies to make long measurements. They don’t bust out a tape measure for this stuff. They get accurate within 0.01’ tolerance (I’ve been told).

This gets increasingly important in older cities like Seattle where most homes were built before there were rules governing setbacks. Your existing house may already be built over your setback line. This is called being “grandfathered” or an “existing nonconformity.” Don’t be alarmed - actually be glad. If it was built before the rules existed (and if you and your architect can prove it), then you can continue to keep your house over the setback line. And more importantly, in some of these circumstances, you are actually allowed to build your new addition along the same continuation of that line. In other words, you may be allowed to continue to break the rules with your new addition too! Your architect can help advise you on whether or not that is an option.

What should you expect to pay for a survey? This depends on what you need documented, how big your property is, how complex it is, and whether or not it’s easily accessible. I’ve seen surveys range from $1500 to $10,000. They are usually under $5000 though. A survey is a very valuable investment that enables your architect to properly design your project and keep you compliant with the land use codes. The surveyor provides the architect with a pdf file and an autocad file that he or she can work with on the computer with 100% accuracy. At a minimum, the architect needs a survey with the property lines and perimeter of the existing structures drawn, and in most cases, the trees, slopes, and easements must be documented, so your architect may determine required setbacks, height limit, and maximum lot coverage calculations.

The full video below takes a deeper dive into all things surveys, and it includes a basic tutorial on how to read a survey drawing.

If you’d like to learn more about our design process, visit www.josharch.com/process, and if you’d like to get us started on your project with a feasibility report, please visit www.josharch.com/help

You get 2 out of 3 by S. Joshua Brincko

IMG_1188.jpg

When you go out to eat, you hope for tasty food, for a good price, with good portions/service. We work hard to earn our money, so if we are going to pay someone to cook a meal for us, we expect to be treated well, not need to clean our own dishes, and be happy with the food they feed us. If we want really high quality gourmet food, there is an expectation that it will cost more and generally come with attentive service. I don’t think anyone expects a gourmet meal with good service to also be cheap. You get 2 out of the 3 things. Good food, good service, not so good price at the fancy restaurant. That is fine. It’s expected. You are paying more for quality. If you just want an average meal at an average restaurant, you might expect the portions to be bigger, the price to be lower, but the food to be just ok. That is fine too. You get 2 out of the 3 things. Good price, good portions, but not the best food at the fast food place. You are paying less for lower quality.

This analogy translates into construction as well. When you hire a builder that does really high quality work, you expect that work to cost more. Or if you want the work to be done really quickly, you should also expect it to cost more (to compensate for the rework that will need to happen as the sequencing of construction steps cannot be controlled, and the builder needs to effectively pay to build some things twice since they could not measure twice and cut once - as the saying goes). If you want really good service, you would also expect that to cost more. If you want a lower price, you should therefore also expect the quality and service to be lower.

When one of the three factors of price, quality, and service is better than the others, the other factors will inevitably be lower. The saying goes, “you get what you pay for.” This is very true in construction. I see this very often. When people choose the lowest priced builder, they are often disappointed when they realize the quality is not great or they don’t have the opportunity to make design or detail decisions during the build. This should be expected. When paying a premium for a really good builder, you can also expect to have the ability to provide feedback for construction details along the way, so you can get exactly what you want. Higher quality (higher priced) builders, offer this level of service, while lower quality (lower priced) builders simply build what suits themselves (their own interpretation of what they think should be built). Client input derails their process and causes the price to go higher.

We work with many different builders who work at different levels of quality, and we advise our clients on which builders are best suited to meet their goals. Some clients expect a high level of detail and others could care less. As we get to know our clients during the design process, we get a pretty good idea of what our clients expect.

If you’d like to learn more about our design process, visit www.josharch.com/process, and if you’d like to get us started on your project with a feasibility report, please visit www.josharch.com/help

Don’t be your own virus by S. Joshua Brincko

Are you happy to have your job? A few weeks ago, you may have taken your job for granted. In the height of our prosperous economy, things were busy, we had options, and we all expected a paycheck. Now that the world has been turned upside down with a pandemic, there is so much uncertainty. Will you get laid off? Have you already been laid off? Will your clients quit doing business with you? 

These are all questions we are all certainly asking in these times, and for many of us, the answer will be yes to one or more of those. Let’s examine different situations. 

Starting with retirees who typically don’t have to worry about an income. They already made the choice to retire because they had the financial security to live out their days on their savings or maybe a pension or government program. For many retirees, they will continue to get those paychecks no matter what happens. Sit back, relax (in quarantine), and nothing really changes for the most part financially. Actually, the cost of goods and services may go down, so this type of person may actually benefit. Other retirees who worked in the private sector for smaller employers are generally living off of their savings. With the hit to the stock market, their savings may look grim, and a lifestyle adjustment like returning to work (if they can get a job) or reducing typical expenses may be needed. This is a very rough situation to be part of. In either case, these retirees are at an age where they may feel a certain paranoia about the seriousness and complications that can arise from the virus that other younger folks are generally capable of fighting off. This uncertainty makes life challenging - even if finances are ok. 

For those who are considered essential workers, this time may actually feel ok financially. Sure, the reality of the stock market crashing is not a great feeling, but we are all in it together. These people know their skills are needed to keep basic human needs flowing, so the paychecks will keep coming. That is one major stressor that may be absent, but it is likely shadowed by a different stressor: since they can’t hunker down in isolation, they are making themselves vulnerable at the workplace of contracting a potentially deadly virus they can pass onto their loved ones and random people unknowingly. The thought of getting or causing a serious illness would constantly weigh on the conscience. Imagine your family struggling with the challenges of being in quarantine and you come home to them every day from your job at a hospital which is essentially a Petri dish. That’s a major burden every day. 

Another group of people are those who work for big corporations that have the ability to carry the overhead expenses of keeping their workers employed even though they are not making much money as a company. This group of people can go on with their sense of security knowing they will get a paycheck on payday. They just need to contend with the boredom of social distancing and possibly less of a workload to keep them busy during the work(from-home)day. If the virus sticks around, and the economy doesn’t recover for awhile, some of these workers will eventually be laid off, and they will be left without financial security and will be even more bored in their isolation. This could potentially become a large part of our population.

There is another group of people who is already in a vulnerable workforce such as a small business that is non-essential, and the doors have been closed by government mandate. These folks are already inevitably laid off and experiencing the stresses of financial insecurity and a job market that doesn’t have any current openings. It’s a grim outlook. 

The final group of people are those who work for a business that is adapting. Maybe your role at your job is to do something completely different than you know or are supposed to be doing. Are you ok with that? Can you handle it? It may be weird, but you are likely just happy you have a job and can earn an income for you and your family. This is a “whatever-it-takes” personality, and this is what we all need right now. Personally, I grew up in a place that had a fragile economy, and this sense of just being happy to have a job was instilled in me. If you had the opportunity to take on more work, more hours, a side job, etc… you did, and you were happy to do it. Money was not easy to come by, so you seized all opportunities (or somebody else would). This is the mindset I have now and have always had.

We need to make the best out of a bad situation. By doing nothing, we won’t get anywhere. By figuring out something productive we can do, we can make a positive impact. Instead of being bored, be proactive. Write a novel. Rethink how you do your job. Plant a garden. Read the municipal codes and regulations for your job and city to understand how your job affects them and is affected by them. Call old friends. Cook meaningful meals. Take apart old electronics and try to understand how they work. Do some online classes and earn a degree or license. Plan for what you will do differently the next time this happens. Enjoy your family. Read proposed legislature in your state or city. Exercise. Build something. Sand the finish off of an old chair and redo it. Take pride in something. Take pride in yourself. Shift your thinking. 

In the big picture, you have the chance to come out of this ahead. 

If you’d like to learn more about our design process, visit www.josharch.com/process, and if you’d like to get us started on your project with a feasibility report, please visit www.josharch.com/help